-
August 4th, 2002, 06:56 PM
#1
Inactive Member
-
August 4th, 2002, 06:57 PM
#2
Inactive Member
-
August 4th, 2002, 07:01 PM
#3
Inactive Member
Velvet Underground were good for their time, but they don't have eternal classic like REM I don't think. Losing My Religion, Everybody Hurts, Nightswimming
-
August 4th, 2002, 07:04 PM
#4
Inactive Member
-
August 4th, 2002, 09:03 PM
#5
professor_pumpernickle
Guest
I'm sticking with Velvet Underground. <---- see what i did there.
-
August 4th, 2002, 09:19 PM
#6
Inactive Member
You moron - "Velvet Underground were good for their time", what the fuck's that supposed to mean, what's changed in the last thirty years to make their music any less relevant, nothing because no-one ever followed on from where they left off, they'll always be just as radical as they ever were
I just don't see the point in trying to compare them to Q and VH1's favourite vaguely arty popsters - the Velvets will always be too dangerous to enjoy the dubious pleasures of such safe consumer consumption
And Everybody Hurts is shit isn't it - string arrangements by Led Zeppelin's bassist, go figure
-
August 4th, 2002, 09:44 PM
#7
Inactive Member
Automatic For The People is better than The Velvet Underground and Nico which is the best VU album.
The VU are to obsecure to appeal as bigger audience as REM.
Guess thats why I prefer REM
-
August 5th, 2002, 08:08 AM
#8
Inactive Member
-
August 5th, 2002, 11:32 AM
#9
Inactive Member
-
August 5th, 2002, 11:33 AM
#10
Inactive Member
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks